In choosing classes for the current semester, I focused almost exclusively on two things; professor and time. After scanning the list of communication classes and marking those with professors I'd liked previously, I went back and circled the ones with acceptable times. In true college student fashion, I gave no real thought to the name of the course or the actual course contents. Yet had I known or even thought that I would spend the entire semester antagonizing four other students, I almost certainly would have made another choice. Nevertheless, as this is not to be a "tattletale" paper, I will try to focus on the leadership development and attempted dissolution within our group.
At the beginning of our project together, we happenstancedly determined that we could each be the leader by taking turns. First Willy organized a subsequent meeting, then I, then no one, and in all honesty, that was fine. No need for a leader really existed at that point as we were independently searching for groups to observe and the concertive control of the group was just as, or more, effective as reporting to a temporary leader.
When I secured the Daily Trojan budget meetings for observation, I once again became the tacit temporary leader. As the agent of our group, it was my responsibility to interface with our contact, David [Lastname], and I was responsible for making sure our group adhered to David's three simple requests; let him know in advance which days would be observed, keep the number of people observing each meeting to a minimum, and keep the newspaper's content confidential until the next day. His third request only required my informing the group members of it, but the first two required me to become a scheduler.
After determining which two days of the week were best in regards to our group schedule, I informed David and we were set to start observing until Christina realized that she had class when she originally agreed to attend. I rearranged our schedules to accommodate by switching Jenn and me to new days and informed David of the change. Yet that attempt was also futile as Christina forgot she had to work during her second choice. I got mad but did not change anything with David.
By this time, I had sort of emerged as the leader within our group simply by being the liaison with David, but we were still trying to be equals and decide everything democratically. To that end, Jenn determined that we should meet the Sunday afternoon before Spring Break to write the introduction to our paper. I knew that the intro wouldn't get written three days before it was due but reluctantly agreed when Jenn insisted.
Amazingly, I was the only person that showed for that Sunday afternoon meeting, and I was pissed. I'd ended my out-of-town weekend early to return for a meeting that I didn't think was necessary, and the person calling it didn't show or cancel. Moreover, I bumped into Christina thirty minutes after the meeting was to have started, and she knew that Jenn wasn't going to show. She, in turn, had decided that she didn't need to show either. It was time for a change.
When our group first met again after Spring Break, I came prepared. I had taken the group assignment and modified it so that each section could be assigned to one person. I elaborated on the things specifically needed for each person and volunteered to do the actual writing of the paper myself. It wasn't quite the saving of the ship that I'd mentioned before, but I'd give it a fair shot. I told them that I would do the best that I could with what I was given, but that's all I would do. If the research for the lit review wasn't there, I wasn't going to the library to do it myself.
The semester moved on and April 4th, the deadline I'd set for the sections to be submitted, the day before they were to be presented in class, came and passed. No one had really done anything at that point, and per my words, I did not do the sections myself. I did type out a bibliography based on the articles Willy gave me, Jenn turned in a rough draft of the methods, and Lorraine submitted a simplistic version of the case description, but it was all sub par.
And so, I became disgusted. The same apathy that had compelled me to become the declared leader was now pushing me away. I no longer wanted to be the leader: I want to be one of the carefree. If we all failed, we all failed, but I was tired of trying to guide those unwilling to be led. The paper had to be a conjunctive task, but I'd made the individual parts as simple as I could. Each person needed only to worry about her or his section and contribute ideas to the results. I'd even intentionally assigned myself the hardest, most time-intensive part, yet that wasn't good enough. I could do no more and gave up.
Yet, oddly enough, I was still the leader in the eyes of the group. Although I told myself that I was no longer the leader and stopped trying to assert authority, I still received progress reports from the other members and I was still promised sections to be submitted. I was truly amazed. I figured the ship would go down and no one would notice, but the group was saying that I was wrong.
With my leadership position established, like it or not, the five of us were to have met the Saturday before our group presentation. At that meeting, in addition to working out our presentation, Willy and Christina were going to give me their sections. As they were in charge of the research and lit review drafts, the only real part I could not write from directly observing the DT, I needed both of their submissions to get started on the paper. Indeed, I'd reserved the entire weekend for writing, but Willy's section was incomplete with only 1.2 pages and Christina's was non-existent.
Perceived leader or not, I was not doing it myself, so we parted under feigned nice terms with Christina and Will promising to have their sections by Monday's class. Monday came and Willy gave me his contribution to the paper, but Christina's still wasn't ready. I wasn't surprised, but just took her rough draft and began writing the final paper shortly thereafter.
Wednesday, the day before the paper was due, Christina gave me a more complete, yet still admittedly incomplete, version of her section. I went home, found some citations Christina had left uncited, and wrote the bibliography by getting the information out of the books myself.
I guess, in some ways, I did go back on my stance and do more of the extra work than I'd said. I became the emergent leader of the group because of apathy and yet that same apathy caused me to want to revert back to a regular group member with a group member's indifference. I can honestly say this has been the least rewarding leadership position I have ever had and the paper was one of the worst on which I've ever ascribed my name. The only thing I have learned without a doubt is that I never want to have another class with a group project. Perhaps more research should focus on that.
|